- Research
- Open Access

# Modelling the lactate response to short-term all out exercise

- Ralph Beneke
^{1}Email author, - Masen D Jumah†
^{2}and - Renate M Leithäuser†
^{3}

**6**:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-6-10

© Beneke et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

**Received:**17 May 2007**Accepted:**09 November 2007**Published:**09 November 2007

## Abstract

### Background

The maximum post exercise blood lactate concentration (BLC_{max}) has been positively correlated with maximal short-term exercise (MSE) performance. However, the moment when BLC_{max} occurs (TBLC_{max}) is rather unpredictable and interpretation of BLC response to MSE is therefore difficult.

### Methods

We compared a 3- and a 4-parameter model for the analysis of the dynamics of BLC response to MSEs lasting 10 (MSE10) and 30 s (MSE30) in eleven males (24.6 ± 2.3 yrs; 182.4 ± 6.8 cm; 75.1 ± 9.4 kg). The 3-parameter model uses BLC at MSE-start, extra-vascular increase (A) and rate constants of BLC appearance (k_{1}) and disappearance (k_{2}). The 4-parameter model includes BLC at MSE termination and amplitudes and rate constants of increase (A_{1}, y_{1}) and decrease (A_{2}, y_{2}) of post MSE-BLC.

### Results

Both models consistently explained 93.69 % or more of the variance of individual BLC responses. Reduction of the number of parameters decreased (p < 0.05) the goodness of the fit in every MSE10 and in 3 MSE30. A (9.1 ± 2.1 vs. 15.3 ± 2.1 mmol l^{-1}) and A_{1} (7.1 ± 1.6 vs. 10.9 ± 2.0 mmol l^{-1}) were lower (p < 0.05) in MSE10 than in MSE30. k_{1} (0.610 ± 0.119 vs. 0.505 ± 0.107 min^{-1}), k_{2} (4.21 10^{-2} ± 1.06 10^{-2} vs. 2.45 10^{-2} ± 1.04 10^{-2} min^{-1}), and A_{2} (-563.8 ± 370.8 vs. -1412.6 ± 868.8 mmol l^{-1}), and y_{1} (0.579 ± 0.137 vs. 0.489 ± 0.076 min^{-1}) were higher (p < 0.05) in MSE10 than in MSE30. No corresponding difference in y_{2} (0.41 10^{-2} ± 0.82 10^{-2} vs. 0.15 10^{-2} ± 0.42 10^{-2} min^{-1}) was found.

### Conclusion

The 3-parameter model estimates of lactate appearance and disappearance were sensitive to differences in test duration and support an interrelation between BLC level and halftime of lactate elimination previously found. The 4-parameter model results support the 3-parameter model findings about lactate appearance; however, parameter estimates for lactate disappearance were unrealistic in the 4-parameter model. The 3-parameter model provides useful information about the dynamics of the lactate response to MSE.

## Keywords

- Blood Lactate Concentration
- Post Exercise
- Blood Compartment
- Lean Tissue Masse
- Lactate Elimination

## Background

In the early part of the last century, lactate was identified as an indicator of glycolytic activity [1–3]. Soon afterwards, it was observed that blood lactate concentration (BLC) continues to increase for a significant period after termination of maximal short-term high-intensity exercise (MSE) before it starts to decrease [4, 5]. The maximum of the post exercise blood lactate concentration (BLC_{max}) has been positively correlated with the ability to tolerate high levels of BLC, required to perform well in MSE events [6–8]. An increase in lactate enables calculation of the energy derived from anaerobic metabolism via glycolysis [6, 8]. However, the moment when BLC_{max} occurs (TBLC_{max}) is rather unpredictable and interpretation of BLC response to MSE is difficult.

_{end_Ex}), the amplitude (A

_{1}) and rate constant (y

_{1}) of the increase and the amplitude (A

_{2}) and the rate constant (y

_{2}) of the decrease of the BLC (Eq.1).

_{0}). It approximates an increase of lactate (A) in the extra-vascular water space generated by exercise metabolism mainly in working muscles during MSE, which is equivalent to the subsequent decrease to the pre-exercise lactate concentration. It furthermore estimates two velocity constants describing the corresponding kinetics of the appearance (k

_{1}) and the disappearance (k

_{2}) of lactate into and out of the blood compartment (Eq.2).

Differentiation of both models allows for the determination of TBLC_{max}, insertion of TBLC_{max} in Eq.1 and Eq.2 give the corresponding BLC_{max}.

The aims of the present study were 1) to test whether the proposed bi-exponential 3-parameter model sufficiently describes the changes in BLC compared with the previously used 4-parameter model, and 2) to analyse how parameters are changed by the duration of the MSE.

## Methods

Eleven male subjects (mean ± SD age: 24.6 ± 2.3 yrs; height: 182.4 ± 6.8 cm; body mass: 75.1 ± 9.4 kg; body mass index: 22.6 ± 2.5 kg m^{-2}; peak oxygen uptake: 4080 ± 228 ml min^{-1}) participated in the present study. All subjects were healthy non-smokers, physically active but not specifically trained. None of whom were receiving any pharmacological or specific dietetic treatment. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects after explanation of the nature and risks involved in participation in the experiments, which conformed to internationally accepted policy statements regarding the use of human subjects as approved by the local ethics committee.

Each subject performed two MSE-tests lasting 10 s (MSE10) and 30 s (MSE30) on a mechanically braked cycle ergometer (834 E, Monark) in a randomised order. All tests were carried out at similar times in the morning at least two hours after a light meal. There was a recovery period of one week between testing sessions. The subjects were instructed not to engage in strenuous activity during the day before an exercise test.

In accordance with accepted recommendations for anaerobic performance testing [15], subjects performed a standardised five minutes cycling warm-up at 50 W which included two sprints lasting three seconds performed at the end of the third and the fourth minute as coordinative preparation for MSE10 and MSE30 tests. After a further 10 minutes of rest, the subjects were instructed to pedal as fast as possible. A resistance corresponding to 7.5 % of the body weight was applied after an acceleration phase of three seconds. After termination of each test, the subjects were supervised during a 20 min rest period, where they maintained a seated position.

The BLC was determined from capillary blood samples drawn from the hyperaemic ear lobe. Samples were taken immediately before each test, within 15 s after each test, minute by minute up to the 10^{th} minute, and every second minute up to the 20^{th} minute post-test. Samples were haemolysed and analysed utilizing the enzymatic amperometric method (Ebio Plus, Eppendorf).

Data are reported as mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD). Differences within subjects were analysed using the paired t-test. A multiple nonlinear regression analysis was used for the approximation of the BLC time courses using the bi-exponential 3-parameter model to determine the constants A, k_{1} and k_{2}, and also the bi-exponential 4-parameter model with the constants A_{1}, A_{2}, y_{1} and y_{2}. The goodness of the fits of the 3- and the 4-parameter model was compared using the F-test [16]. The interrelationships between selected variables were examined using simple regression analysis. Statistical significance was indicated using an alpha level of 0.05.

## Results

### Performance and BLC

^{-1}, p < 0.05), whilst average mechanical work was lower (100.6 ± 9.8 vs. 248.0 ± 21.5 J kg

^{-1}, p < 0.05) in MSE10 than in MSE30. At any post MSE time, the BLC was consistently higher (p < 0.05) under MSE30- than under MSE10-conditions (Fig. 1, 2, 3, 4).

### Goodness of fits, parameter estimations, TBLC_{max} and BLC_{max}

^{2}≥ 0.9369). The reduction of the number of parameters decreased the goodness of the fit in every MSE10 and in 3 tests under MSE30-conditions (Tab. 1 and 2 and Fig. 1, 2, 3, 4).

3-parameter vs. 4-parameter model to describe the BLC-response to MSE10

No | Model | R | SS ((mmol l | A & A | k | A | k | F-test |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | 3-Par. | 0.9612 | 1.4722 | 7.6001 | 0.4648 | 0.0665 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9814 | 0.4127 | 6.3018 | 0.3685 | -18.4300 | 0.0206 | ||

2 | 3-Par. | 0.9882 | 0.5224 | 7.4582 | 0.4197 | 0.0491 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9902 | 0.2586 | 6.3885 | 0.5273 | -665.7111 | 0.0003 | ||

3 | 3-Par. | 0.9932 | 0.7271 | 11.1438 | 0.5304 | 0.0317 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9975 | 0.1277 | 9.0771 | 0.4665 | -403.1144 | 0.0007 | ||

4 | 3-Par. | 0.9900 | 0.1645 | 4.3546 | 0.6661 | 0.0318 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9885 | 0.0833 | 3.5289 | 0.6283 | -272.6364 | 0.0004 | ||

5 | 3-Par. | 0.9934 | 0.6322 | 11.2838 | 0.7024 | 0.0498 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9967 | 0.1685 | 8.5908 | 0.6356 | -21.6096 | 0.0209 | ||

6 | 3-Par. | 0.9903 | 0.7606 | 9.4807 | 0.7199 | 0.0363 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9924 | 0.2987 | 7.3507 | 0.7579 | -1067.4220 | 0.0002 | ||

7 | 3-Par. | 0.9914 | 0.8179 | 10.4780 | 0.6771 | 0.0317 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9935 | 0.2906 | 8.0916 | 0.6162 | -961.1428 | 0.0003 | ||

8 | 3-Par. | 0.9805 | 1.0944 | 8.1816 | 0.7267 | 0.0348 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9871 | 0.3348 | 6.1414 | 0.6068 | -917.7335 | 0.0002 | ||

9 | 3-Par. | 0.9871 | 0.7901 | 8.4675 | 0.7458 | 0.0425 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9905 | 0.3065 | 6.4371 | 0.8290 | -669.8416 | 0.0003 | ||

10 | 3-Par. | 0.9778 | 2.0009 | 10.7703 | 0.5843 | 0.0423 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9928 | 0.3211 | 8.3454 | 0.4849 | -838.0681 | 0.0004 | ||

11 | 3-Par. | 0.9877 | 1.0402 | 10.6474 | 0.4781 | 0.0464 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9945 | 0.2487 | 8.5783 | 0.4454 | -366.2962 | 0.0009 |

3-parameter vs. 4-parameter model to describe the BLC-response to MSE30

No | Model | R | SS ((mmol l | A & A | k | A | k | F-test |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | 3-Par. | 0.9813 | 3.3496 | 14.9744 | 0.3805 | 0.0304 | ||

4-Par. | 0.9613 | 3.2491 | 11.5457 | 0.4533 | -1644.1026 | 0.0002 | ||

2 | 3-Par. | 0.9944 | 1.2735 | 16.2805 | 0.4054 | 0.0213 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9946 | 0.5160 | 12.5178 | 0.3504 | -733.8497 | 0.0004 | ||

3 | 3-Par. | 0.9929 | 1.7610 | 15.8388 | 0.5378 | 0.0098 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9934 | 0.5882 | 11.1687 | 0.4186 | -15.7730 | 0.0142 | ||

4 | 3-Par. | 0.9754 | 2.0272 | 10.0625 | 0.6528 | 0.0234 | ||

4-Par. | 0.9369 | 1.7294 | 6.4807 | 0.5995 | -1935.3727 | 0.0001 | ||

5 | 3-Par. | 0.9939 | 1.5333 | 18.7569 | 0.3780 | 0.0408 | ||

4-Par. | 0.9899 | 1.2244 | 14.0299 | 0.4763 | -717.1412 | 0.0006 | ||

6 | 3-Par. | 0.9711 | 4.6991 | 15.1327 | 0.5009 | 0.0432 | ||

4-Par. | 0.9560 | 3.2632 | 10.3104 | 0.5295 | -3260.3276 | 0.0001 | ||

7 | 3-Par. | 0.9904 | 1.7884 | 15.0838 | 0.6263 | 0.0193 | # | |

4-Par. | 0.9831 | 0.9845 | 9.8006 | 0.5342 | -1784.7679 | 0.0001 | ||

8 | 3-Par. | 0.9967 | 0.6126 | 14.7640 | 0.4912 | 0.0219 | ||

4-Par. | 0.9931 | 0.5131 | 10.4533 | 0.5033 | -977.3814 | 0.0003 | ||

9 | 3-Par. | 0.9937 | 1.2066 | 15.2064 | 0.6656 | 0.0204 | ||

4-Par. | 0.9880 | 0.7076 | 9.4287 | 0.6027 | -1188.8360 | 0.0002 | ||

10 | 3-Par. | 0.9932 | 1.6160 | 15.4396 | 0.5053 | 0.0126 | ||

4-Par. | 0.9842 | 1.4673 | 10.9240 | 0.4777 | -1177.0599 | 0.0002 | ||

11 | 3-Par. | 0.9936 | 1.5344 | 17.1709 | 0.4081 | 0.0270 | ||

4-Par. | 0.9878 | 1.2859 | 13.0576 | 0.4348 | -2103.6627 | 0.0002 |

_{1}of the 3- and y

_{1}of the 4-parameter model. Furthermore, all lactate appearance parameters were highly correlated between both models (r > 0.84, p < 0.001). Contrary to the latter in both tests k

_{2}was higher (p < 0.05) than y

_{2}(Tab. 3 and 4).

Kinetics of the blood lactate response to given short-term maximal cycling tests based on the bi-exponential 3-parameter model

MSE10 | MSE30 | |
---|---|---|

A (mmol l | 9.1 ± 2.1 | 15.3 ± 2.1* |

K | 0.610 ± 0.119 | 0.505 ± 0.107* |

K | 4.21 10 | 2.45 10 |

BLC | 8.5 ± 1.9 | 14.1 ± 1.8* |

TBLC | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 6.6 ± 1.0* |

Kinetics of the blood lactate response to given short-term maximal cycling tests based on the bi-exponential 4-parameter model

MSE10 | MSE30 | |
---|---|---|

A | 7.1 ± 1.6 | 10.9 ± 2.0* |

y | 0.579 ± 0.137 | 0.489 ± 0.076* |

A | -563.8 ± 370.8 | -1412.6 ± 868.8* |

y | 0.41 10 | 0.15 10 |

BLC | 8.4 ± 1.8 | 14.1 ± 1.8* |

TBLC | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 6.1 ± 1.0* |

TBLC_{max} in MSE30 and BLC_{max} in MSE10 were higher (p < 0.05) using the 3- than the 4-parameter model (Tab. 3 and 4). BLC_{max} in MSE10 was also higher (p < 0.05) than the corresponding highest directly measured BLC of 8.4 ± 1.8 mmol l^{-1}. All maxima estimated with different models were highly correlated (all r > 0.91, p < 0.001).

### Effect of test duration

_{max}and TBLC

_{max}in MSE10 than in MSE30 (Tab. 3). k

_{1}and k

_{2}were higher (p < 0.05) in MSE10 than in MSE30 (Tab. 3). A negative correlation (p < 0.05) between k

_{2}and A (r = 0.51; p < 0.005; y = -0.006 x + 0.056) and k

_{2}and BLC

_{max}was found (Fig. 5).

Use of the 4-parameter model showed lower (p < 0.05) values of A_{1}, and higher (p < 0.05) levels of A_{2} and y_{1} in MSE10 than in MSE30 (Tab. 4). No significant difference in y_{2} was found between MSE10 and MSE30 (Tab. 4).

## Discussion

Both MSE tests generated normal to high values of power output, work and BLC values for maximal exercise tests of corresponding durations in non-specifically trained healthy male subjects aged 20 to 30 years [6, 7, 15, 17].

Under these conditions, the bi-exponential 3-parameter and the 4-parameter model adequately described the changes in BLC as a cumulative effect of all related factors irrespective of whether any of these factors' specific behaviour may be described adequately using exponential models as well. Reduction of the number of parameters from 4 to 3 did clearly impair the goodness of the fit of the BLC under MSE10- but only to a minor extent under MSE30-conditions.

The observed differences in A and BLC_{max} between MSE10 and MSE30 clearly reproduced the frequent observation that after high intensity short term exercise the BLC is not only a result of exercise intensity but also of the duration of the event requiring net lactate production in the extra-vascular compartment. Higher values of A and BLC_{max} coincided with an increase of TBLC_{max} from approx. 5 min to 7 min. Differences between calculated and directly measured values of BLC_{max} of approximately 1 % reflect time intervals of less than ± 1 min of TBLC_{max}, which appears practically neglectable under the consideration of usual blood sampling intervals between 1 and 3 min. Both models show that the longer TBLC_{max} results from a combined decrease of the rate constants of lactate invasion and lactate evasion.

Neither the 3- nor the 4-parameter model does directly predict the real amount of intra-muscular lactate increase of any specific muscle. MSE10 and MSE30 leg-cycle ergometries are whole-body exercises involving significant contributions from lean tissue masses throughout the entire body [18]. Assuming a muscle mass of 40 % of total body mass and typical dilution factors for total body water and blood water content [7, 8, 19, 20], the A-values estimated for MSE10 and MSE30 do represent a net increase in muscular lactate of 16.9 mmol kg^{-1} (MSE10) and 27.6 mmol kg^{-1} (MSE30), equivalent to a rate of net increase in muscular lactate of 1.69 mmol kg^{-1} s^{-1} and 0.92 mmol kg^{-1} s^{-1}. These values are well within the range of the magnitude of directly measured intra-muscular lactates and equivalents of approx. 1.18 kJ kg^{-1} and 1.93 kJ kg^{-1} of anaerobic lactic energy production found in previous studies that used comparable durations of maximal cycling or electrical stimulation [17, 21, 22].

Both models provided almost identical results about the invasion of lactate into the blood compartment. This was not the case with respect to the lactate elimination. The 3-parameter model supported previous results that the rate constant decreases if the BLC_{max} increases [23–25]. The k_{2}-values found in the present experiments using the 3-parameter model represent rate constants of lactate elimination equivalent to BLC half times similar to others determined previously [23–25]. Contrary, the 4-parameter model provided y_{2}-estimates equivalent to halftimes of the BLC decrease of approx. 1650 min under MSE10- and approx. 3450 min under MSE30-conditions combined with extreme values of A_{2} (Tab. 1, 2 and 4). These extreme parameter estimations of the 4-parameter model seem to indicate that the use of a relatively short post exercise period combined with the limited number of data points were insufficient for the most successful application of the 4-parameter model, despite an excellent goodness of the fits.

The latter may be indirectly supported by other previous studies, which used the 4-parameter model with recovery periods of up to 120 minutes [10, 26–29]. Using the 4-parameter model they estimated A_{2} values not lower than -22.5 mmol l^{-1} and halftimes of the BLC decrease more or less equivalent with k_{2}-values estimated with the 3-parameter model in the present study and others [30] (Tab. 1, 2, 3).

## Conclusion

The 3-parameter model and the 4-parameter model adequately described the changes in BLC under MSE conditions. Reduction of the number of parameters did impair the goodness of the fit of the BLC. However, under the given testing conditions the 3-parameter model seems to provide more realistic parameter estimations with respect to the elimination of lactate from the blood compartment even at relative short periods of blood sampling.

The proposed 3-parameter model seems to provide useful information about the dynamics of lactate in the blood and in the extra-vascular compartment and it is sensitive to changes in test duration.

Increase of the duration of MSE from 10 to 30 s increases BLC_{max} and delays TBLC_{max} from approx. 5 to approx. 7 min. The latter delay is a combined effect of decreased rate constants of lactate invasion and particularly lactate evasion from the blood compartment.

## Notes

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Oliver Grzegorski for his support for the acquisition of the experimental data.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Boycott AE, Haldane JS: The effects of low atmospheric pressures on respiration. J Physiol (Lond). 1908, 37: 355-377.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Embden G, Lehnartz E, Hentschel H: Der zeitliche Verlauf der Milchsäurebildung bei Muskelkontraktion. Z Physiol Chem. 1927, 165: 255-278.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hill AV, Long CNH, Lupton H: Muscular exercise, lactic acid, and the supply and utilisation of oxygen: parts IV-VI. Proc Roy Soc B. 1924, 97: 84-138.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bang O: The lactate content of the blood during and after muscular exercise in man. Contributions to the physiology of severe muscular work. Edited by: Bang O, Boje O, Nielsen M. 1936, Skandinavisches Archiv für Physiologie (Acta Societatis Physiologicae Scandinavicae), 51-82.Google Scholar
- Margaria R, Edwards HT: The removal of lactic acid from the body during recovery from muscular exercise. Am J Physiol. 1934, 107: 681-686.Google Scholar
- Beneke R, Pollmann Ch, Bleif I, Leithäuser RM, Hütler M: How anaerobic is the Wingate Anaerobic Test for humans?. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002, 87: 388-392. 10.1007/s00421-002-0622-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beneke R, Hütler M, Jung M, Leithäuser RM: Lactate response to maximal short-term high intensity exercise in children, adolescents and adults. J Appl Physiol. 2005, 99: 499-504. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00062.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- di Prampero PE: Energetics of muscular exercise. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1981, 89: 144-222.Google Scholar
- Freund H, Zouloumian P: Lactate after exercise in man. I. Evolution kinetics in arterial blood. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1981, 46: 121-133. 10.1007/BF00428865.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freund H, Zouloumian P: Lactate after exercise in man. IV. Physiological observations and model predictions. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1981, 46: 161-176. 10.1007/BF00428868.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zouloumian P, Freund H: Lactate after exercise in man. II Mathematical model. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1981, 46: 135-147. 10.1007/BF00428866.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zouloumian P, Freund H: Lactate after exercise in man. III Properties of the Compartment Model. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1981, 46: 149-160. 10.1007/BF00428867.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bateman H: The solution of a system of differential equations occurring in the theory of radioactive transformations. Proc Cambridge Phil Soc. 1910, 15: 423-427.Google Scholar
- Dost FH: Grundlagen der Pharmakokinetik. 1968, Georg Thime Verlag, Stuttgart, 36-47.Google Scholar
- Inbar O, Bar-Or O, Skinner JS: The Wingate Anaerobic Test. 1996, Human Kinetics, Champaign, USA, 8-94.Google Scholar
- Motulsky HJ, Ransnas LA: Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review. FASEB J. 1987, 1: 365-374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs I, Tesch PA, Bar-Or O, Karlsson J, Dotan R: Lactate in human skeletal muscle after 10 and 30 s of supramaximal exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1983, 55: 365-367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker J, Brown E, Hill G, Pillips G, Williams R, Davies B: Handgrip contribution to lactate production and leg power during high-intensity exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002, 34: 1037-1040. 10.1097/00005768-200205001-00413.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beneke R: Maximal lactate steady state concentration (MLSS): experimental and modelling approaches. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003, 88: 361-369.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- di Prampero PE, Peeters L, Margaria R: Alactic O
_{2}debt and lactic acid production after exhausting exercise in man. J Appl Physiol. 1973, 34 (5): 628-632.PubMedGoogle Scholar - Jones NL, McCartney N, Graham T, Spriet LL, Kowalchuk JM, Heigenhauser GJF, Sutton JR: Muscle performance and metabolism in maximal isokinetic cycling at slow and fast speeds. J Appl Physiol. 1985, 59: 132-136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spriet LL, Soderlund K, Bergstrom M, Hultman E: Anaerobic energy release in skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation in men. J Appl Physiol. 1987, 62: 611-615. 10.1063/1.339788.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freund H, Oyono-Enguelle S, Heitz A, Marbach J, Ott C, Zouloumian P, Lampert E: Work rate-dependent lactate kinetics after exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1986, 61: 932-939.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heck H: Laktat in der Leistungsdiagnostik. Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe des deutschen Sportbundes. 1990, Verlag Karl Hofmann, SchorndorfGoogle Scholar
- McLellan TM, Skinner JS: Blood lactate removal during recovery related to the aerobic threshold. Int J Sports Med. 1982, 3: 224-229.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bassett DR, Merrill PW, Nagle FR, Agre JC, Sampedro R: Rate of decline in blood lactate after cycling exercise in endurance-trained and -untrained subjects. J Appl Physiol. 1991, 70: 1816-1820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freund H, Oyono-Enguelle S, Heitz A, Marbach J, Ott C, Gartner M: Effect of exercise duration on lactate kinetics after short muscular exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1989, 58: 534-542. 10.1007/BF02330709.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oyono-Enguelle S, Gartner M, Marbach J, Heitz A, Ott C, Freund H: Comparison of arterial and venous blood lactate kinetics after short exercise. Int J Sports Med. 1989, 10: 16-24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Messonnier L, Freund H, Denis C, Feasson L, Lacour JR: Effect of training on lactate kinetics parameters and their influence on short high-intensity exercise performance. Int J Sport Med. 2006, 27: 60-66. 10.1055/s-2005-837507.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McLoughlin P, McCaffrey N, Moynihan JB: Gentle exercise with a previously inactive muscle group hastens the decline of blood lactate concentration after strenuous exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1991, 62: 274-278. 10.1007/BF00571552.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.