- Open Access
Paramagnetic artifact and safety criteria for human brain mapping
© Seiyama et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
- Received: 09 March 2005
- Accepted: 07 May 2005
- Published: 07 May 2005
Biological effects of magnetic field and their safety criteria, especially effects of gradient magnetic field on the cerebral and pulmonary circulation during functional brain mapping are still unclear. Here we estimated that magnetically induced artifacts for the blood oxygenation level- and flow- based functional magnetic resonance imaging are less than 0.1%, and disturbance in the pulmonary circulation is less than 1.3% even if the field strength of magnetic resonance system is risen up to 10 tesla. These paramagnetic effects are considered to be small and harmless during human brain mapping.
- Magnetic Field
- Magnetic Field Strength
- Static Magnetic Field
- Pulmonary Blood Flow
- Gradient Magnetic Field
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become a vital tool for human brain function studies and medical diagnosis. Magnetic field strengths are expected to rise from the current 1.5 to 7 tesla (T) or further to achieve higher spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio, although biological effects of magnetic fields and their safety criteria for human subjects are still unclear. Biological effects of magnetic fields depend mainly on 1) the field strength and its gradient, 2) area and duration time of exposure to the field, and 3) the static or dynamic properties of magnetic field . The threshold of time-varying magnetic fields to human exposure is a frequent theme and examined experimentally and theoretically [1, 2], because they might produce cardiac and peripheral nerve stimulation, heating, and magneto-phosphene during exposure. Furthermore, movement of subjects or patients within a static magnetic field produces sensory effects such as vertigo, nausea, and a peculiar metallic taste .
On the other hand, the static magnetic field has a potential to affect the blood flow through the following three mechanisms: 1) magnetohydrodynamic action, which is theoretically predicted to decrease the aortic blood flow velocity by 10% under homogeneous magnetic fields at about 5 T , 2) diamagnetic anisotropic interaction, which modifies the orientation of sickled and normal erythrocytes at homogeneous magnetic field of 0.35 T and 4 T , respectively, and 3) paramagnetic interaction under a strong spatial gradient of magnetic field, which was applied to separate paramagnetic erythrocyte from whole blood .
Paramagnetic interaction between gradient magnetic fields and flowing erythrocytes
Effect of gradient magnetic fields on the pulmonary circulation
First, we estimated the maximal effects of the deviation of erythrocyte distribution on the pulmonary blood flow, which could cause a ventilation perfusion mismatch (Fig. 1B). When a volunteer was positioned under the maximal inhomogeneous magnetic field (position B in Fig. 1A), the deviation of erythrocyte distribution in the pulmonary blood flow increased with increases in the product of field strength and its gradient but it saturated above |Bz·dBz/dz| > 40 T2/m (Fig. 1B). However, the estimated value of deviation (maximally ca. 1.3%) was small and its effect on the ventilation perfusion mismatch is negligible even under the maximal inhomogeneous magnetic field generated by the 10-T system.
Effect of gradient magnetic fields on the cerebral microcirculation
Our results suggest that paramagnetic artifacts in the functional neuroimaging and disturbance in the pulmonary microcirculation during magnetic resonance imaging are quite small using the MR system with field strength up to 10 T.
- International Electrotechnical Commission: Internationalstandard: Part 2. Particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis. CEI/IEC 60601-2-33. 2002Google Scholar
- Schaefer DJ, Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA: Review of patient safety in time-varying gradient fields. J Magn Reson Imag. 2000, 12: 20-29. 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<20::AID-JMRI3>3.0.CO;2-Y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schenck JF: Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imag. 2000, 12: 2-19. 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<2::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO;2-V.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen IIH, Saha S: Analysis of an intensive magnetic fields on blood flow. J Bioelectricity. 1984, 3: 293-298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murayama M: Orientation of sickled erythrocytes in a magnetic field. Nature. 1965, 206: 420-422.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamagishi A, Takeuchi T, Higashi T, Date M: Diamagnetic orientation of blood cells in high magnetic field. Physica B. 1992, 177: 523-526.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Melville D, Paul F, Roath S: Direct magnetic separation of red cells from whole blood. Nature. 1975, 255: 706-PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seiyama A, Maeda N, Shiga T: Analysis of distribution of flowing erythrocytes in a model vessel under an inhomogeneous magnetic field. Eur Biophys J. 1996, 25: 1-7. 10.1007/s002490050009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okazaki M, Maeda N, Shiga T: Effect of an inhomogeneous magnetic field on flowing erythrocytes. Eur Biophys J. 1987, 14: 139-145. 10.1007/BF00253838.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.